From Hope to Hopelessness
Margaret J. Wheatley
As the world grows ever darker, I've been forcing myself to think
about hope. I watch as the world and the people near me experience
increased grief and suffering. As aggression and violence move into
all relationships, personal and global. As decisions are made from
insecurity and fear. How is it possible to feel hopeful, to look
forward to a more positive future? The Biblical Psalmist wrote that,
"without vision the people perish." Am I perishing?
“In the end, it is the reality of personal relationship
that saves everything.”
|
I don't ask this question calmly. I am struggling to understand
how I might contribute to reversing this descent into fear and sorrow,
what I might do to help restore hope to the future. In the past,
it was easier to believe in my own effectiveness. If I worked hard,
with good colleagues and good ideas, we could make a difference.
But now, I sincerely doubt that. Yet without hope that my labor
will produce results, how can I keep going? If I have no belief
that my visions can become real, where will I find the strength
to persevere?
To answer these questions, I've consulted some who have endured dark
times. They have led me on a journey into new questions, one that
has taken me from hope to hopelessness.
Web of hope
My journey began with a little booklet entitled "The Web of
Hope." It lists the signs of despair and hope for Earth's most
pressing problems. Foremost among these is the ecological destruction
humans have created. Yet the only thing the booklet lists as hopeful
is that the earth works to create and maintain the conditions that
support life. As the species of destruction, humans will be kicked
off if we don't soon change our ways. E.O.Wilson, the well-known
biologist, comments that humans are the only major species that,
were we to disappear, every other species would benefit (except
pets and houseplants.) The Dalai Lama has been saying the same thing
in many recent teachings.
This didn't make me feel hopeful.
But in the same booklet, I read a quote from Rudolf Bahro that
did help: "When the forms of an old culture are dying, the
new culture is created by a few people who are not afraid to be
insecure." Could insecurity, self-doubt, be a good trait? I
find it hard to imagine how I can work for the future without feeling
grounded in the belief that my actions will make a difference. But
Bahro offers a new prospect, that feeling insecure, even groundless,
might actually increase my ability to stay in the work. I've read
about groundlessness — especially in Buddhism — and recently
have experienced it quite a bit. I haven't liked it at all, but
as the dying culture turns to mush, could I give up seeking ground
to stand?
Vaclev Havel helped me become further attracted to insecurity and
not-knowing. "Hope," he states, "is a dimension of
the soul. . . an orientation of the spirit, an orientation of the
heart. It transcends the world that is immediately experienced and
is anchored somewhere beyond its horizons. . . .It is not the conviction
that something will turn out well, but the certainty that something
makes sense regardless of how it turns out."
The liberation of hopelessness
Havel seems to be describing not hope, but hopelessness. Being
liberated from results, giving up outcomes, doing what feels right
rather than effective. He helps me recall the Buddhist teaching
that hopelessness is not the opposite of hope. Fear is. Hope and
fear are inescapable partners. Anytime we hope for a certain outcome,
and work hard to make it a happen, then we also introduce fear--fear
of failing, fear of loss. Hopelessness is free of fear and thus
can feel quite liberating. I've listened to others describe this
state. Unburdened of strong emotions, they describe the miraculous
appearance of clarity and energy.
Thomas Merton, the late Christian mystic, clarified further the
journey into hopelessness. In a letter to a friend, he advised:
"Do not depend on the hope of results . . .you may have to
face the fact that your work will be apparently worthless and even
achieve no result at all, if not perhaps results opposite to what
you expect. As you get used to this idea, you start more and more
to concentrate not on the results, but on the value, the rightness,
the truth of the work itself. . . .you gradually struggle less and
less for an idea and more and more for specific people . . . .In
the end, it is the reality of personal relationship that saves everything."
I know this to be true. I've been working with colleagues in Zimbabwe
as their country descends into violence and starvation by the actions
of a madman dictator. Yet as we exchange emails and occasional visits,
we're learning that joy is still available, not from the circumstances,
but from our relationships. As long as we're together, as long as
we feel others supporting us, we persevere. Some of my best teachers
of this have been young leaders. One in her twenties said:: "How
we're going is important, not where. I want to go together and with
faith." Another young Danish woman at the end of a conversation
that moved us all to despair, quietly spoke: "I feel like we're
holding hands as we walk into a deep, dark woods." A Zimbabwean,
in her darkest moment wrote: "In my grief I saw myself being
held, us all holding one another in this incredible web of loving
kindness. Grief and love in the same place. I felt as if my heart
would burst with holding it all ."
Thomas Merton was right: we are consoled and strengthened by being
hopeless together. We don't need specific outcomes. We need each
other.
Hopelessness has surprised me with patience. As I abandon the pursuit
of effectiveness, and watch my anxiety fade, patience appears. Two
visionary leaders, Moses and Abraham, both carried promises given
to them by their God, but they had to abandon hope that they would
see these in their lifetime. They led from faith, not hope, from
a relationship with something beyond their comprehension. T.S. Eliot
describes this better than anyone. In the "Four Quartets"
he writes :
I said to my soul, be still, and wait without hope
for hope would be hope for the wrong thing;
wait without love
For love would be love of the wrong thing; there is yet faith
But the faith and the love and the hope are all in the waiting.
This is how I want to journey through this time of increasing
uncertainty. Groundless, hopeless, insecure, patient, clear. And
together.
©2002 Margaret Wheatley writes, teaches, and
speaks about radically new practices and ideas for organizing in
chaotic times. She works to create organizations of all types where
people are known as the blessing, not the problem. She draws many
of her ideas from new science and life's ability to organize in
self-organizing, systemic, and cooperative modes. Her articles and
work can be accessed at www.margaretwheatley.com
|